Instead of the awkward form: [1,2,3].include?(elem), you can now use: elem.in?([1,2,3])
Required Ruby Version
>= 0
Authors
Ben Dunkley
Versions
-
0.1.0
-
source
- 0.1.0 source November 17, 2015 (7.5 KB)
-
Instead of the awkward form: [1,2,3].include?(elem), you can now use: elem.in?([1,2,3])
>= 0
Ben Dunkley
source